Platform Go-to-Market CRM E-Commerce Marketplace Social Media Customer Service Call Center Purchasing Inventory Management Manufacturing Supply Chain Planning Warehouse Management Logistics Export Planner Global Trade Compliance Booking System Project Management Asset Management Staff Leasing IT Service Management Knowledge Base Forms & Surveys Profitability Monitor Enterprise Consolidation Contract Management Personal Finance Business Intelligence Predictive Analytics AI Onboarding Integrations Website Builder Learning Management Label Design Food Production Food Security Food Trade Food Regulatory Waste & ESG Compliance Suite Real Estate Publishing Pricing Request a demo
IT Service Management

Run IT like a service, not a queue

A full ITSM suite — service catalog, incidents, problems and change management — beyond a basic helpdesk. Catalog requests, incidents and root-cause problems all share the same record the asset and the knowledge article are linked to.

Service catalog · Incidents · Problems · Change requests · ITIL-aligned
app.response365.ai · ITSM · INC-4821
Service catalog 28 services published
New laptop
2d SLA
Access request
4h SLA
VPN setup
1h SLA
Incident INC-4821 · Email outage
P2 · 14 users affectedExchange relay timeouts
Incident
PRB-318 · DNS resolverroot cause under investigation
Linked problem
CHG-902 · DNS upgradeCAB review · Tue 14:00
Pending change
Catalog → incident → problem → changeone linked record
ITIL-alignedincident · problem · change
28
catalog service templates
3
ITIL processes, linked
6
change request states
40+
native integrations on the platform
The problem

Your helpdesk is a shared inbox — IT keeps fighting the same fires

There is no real catalog, so requests arrive as free-text emails. Incidents close without anyone writing down what actually broke. Change requests live in a chat thread. The same outage happens again next month, and nobody can prove it was the same one.

Response365 puts the catalog, the incident, the problem and the change on one linked record — so resolving an issue today actually prevents it tomorrow, and every modification to the environment has a paper trail.

Shared inboxFree-text requests
IncidentsClosed, not understood
ProblemsNobody wrote them down
ChangesA chat-thread approval
AssetsSpreadsheet of CIs
KnowledgeA Confluence nobody finds
Why it's different

A real ITSM suite, not a ticket form with extra fields

A real service catalog

Employees pick a service from a structured catalog — laptop, access, VPN, onboarding — and the request arrives with the right fields, the right approver and the fulfillment tasks already populated.

Resolve, then prevent

Every incident can be linked to an underlying problem record. Close the ticket and the root cause stays open — so the same fire doesn't start twice next quarter.

Change without chaos

Change requests route through approval and a CAB review, with six states from draft to closed. Every modification to the environment leaves an audit trail nobody has to reconstruct.

One linked record

From a catalog request to a closed change — the same chain

An ITIL-aligned chain that survives shift handovers. Knowledge articles, configuration items and post-incident reviews all point back to the same record.

1
Catalog request

An employee picks a service from the catalog — fields, approver and fulfillment tasks pre-populated.

2
Incident raised

A self-service report or a monitoring alert opens an incident, prioritised and assigned.

3
Triage & SLA

Priority and category drive the SLA clock; the incident is routed to the right queue and engineer.

4
Resolution

Resolved with the steps that worked — captured as a draft knowledge article in the same flow.

5
Problem linked

If it's a known fault or a repeat, the incident is linked to a problem record for root-cause analysis.

6
Change raised

The fix becomes a change request — risk, rollback plan and approver chain attached.

7
CAB & deploy

Reviewed, scheduled and deployed in the maintenance window. one record, end to end

The service catalog

Publish a real service catalog — not a contact form

Employees request services from a structured catalog with built-in fulfillment tasks.

  • Structured serviceseach catalog item has its own fields, approver, SLA and fulfillment template
  • Built-in fulfillment tasks"New laptop" auto-creates the procurement, asset and access sub-tasks
  • Approver chainscost, role or sensitivity gates the request to the right manager automatically
  • Self-service portalemployees track their requests without emailing IT for a status update
New laptopprocurement · provisioning · access
2d SLA
Access requestmanager + system owner approval
4h SLA
VPN setupauto-fulfilled · zero touch
1h SLA
Onboarding bundlelaptop + accounts + tools, one request
Day 1
Incidents & problems

Resolve the ticket, prevent the next one

Manage incidents and link them to underlying problems so the same fire doesn't start twice.

  • Incident lifecyclenew → triaged → in progress → resolved → closed, with SLA timers per stage
  • Major-incident modeone record collects every duplicate report and broadcasts updates
  • Linked problem recordsrepeat incidents promote to a problem with cause, workaround and known-error status
  • Post-incident reviewtimeline, contributing factors and action items, captured on the record itself
INC-4821 · Email outageP2 · 14 users · 38 min open
Active
SLA timer · 2h 22m leftP2 resolution target 4h
On track
PRB-318 · DNS resolver3 incidents linked · workaround in KB
Known error
PIR draftedtimeline + 4 action items
Review
Change management

Six states, one approval chain, full audit

Route change requests through approval and track every modification to your environment.

  • Six change statesdraft, submitted, approved, scheduled, implemented, closed — each with its own gate
  • Three change typesstandard, normal and emergency — each routed to a different approval path
  • CAB review & calendarscheduled in a shared change calendar with conflict detection across services
  • Risk & rollbackrisk score, rollback plan and back-out window captured on every record
1
Draft

Owner writes scope, risk and rollback.

2
Submitted

Routed by type — standard, normal or emergency.

3
Approved

Approver chain signed; CAB review where required.

4
Scheduled

Booked into the change calendar; conflict check runs.

5
Implemented

Deployed in window; outcome logged on the record.

6
Closed

Reviewed; failed changes raise a problem automatically. full audit trail

Operational workflows

The IT workflows most teams run on tribal knowledge

SLA management

Priority-driven SLA timers with business-hours awareness, pause-on-customer-wait and breach alerts — applied to incidents, requests and changes from the same rule set.

Knowledge in the workflow

Resolution steps captured at close become drafts in the knowledge base. The next time a similar incident opens, the article is suggested before triage.

Asset & CI linking

Every incident, problem and change can be linked to a configuration item from Asset Management — so "which laptops are on the affected switch" is one query, not a spreadsheet hunt.

Build vs buy

The absence of the per-agent ITSM bill

CapabilityServiceNow ITSMJira Service ManagementResponse365 ITSM
Structured service catalog with fulfillment tasksYes — per-agent licenseAdd-on / formsYes — included
Incident linked to a problem recordYesLimitedYes — native link
Change management (six states, CAB)YesPremium tierYes — included
One record across catalog, incident, problem, changeYes — same suiteSync between projectsYes — same row
SLA engine with business hours & pauseYesYesYes — shared rule set
Knowledge base in the resolution flowAdd-onAdd-on (Confluence)Yes — native
Asset / CI linked to tickets & changesSeparate CMDB licenseAdd-on (Assets)Yes — same platform
One customer/employee record across the businessData migrationSync via integrationYes — same row
CostPer-agent/mo + add-onsPer-agent/mo + tiersIncluded in Response365
The business case

What this means in euros

The conservative annual case for an IT team of 20 agents supporting roughly 1,500 employees.

€40–90k
Replace the ITSM tool

Retire ServiceNow ITSM or Jira Service Management Premium plus the CMDB and knowledge add-ons.

€80–140k
Reduce MTTR

Linked problems, suggested knowledge articles and CI context cut average resolution time on repeat incidents.

€30–60k
Cut repeat incidents

Promoting recurring incidents to problems with a tracked fix prevents the same outage from costing the business twice.

€150–290krecoverable in year one

Conservative range — actual figures depend on your current ITSM licensing tier, agent count and the share of incidents that today close without a linked problem record.

Catalog, incident, problem and change — one linked record

Let us show you in seven minutes how a catalog request becomes a fulfillment task, an incident links to a problem, and the fix routes through a change request — all on the same record, with knowledge and assets attached.